Difference between revisions of "Patent classification systems"

From Inventing aviation
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Some overview, with an emphasis on internationally and nationally evolving processes, with an emphasis on differences between generally international retroactive projection of classifications onto antique and national material, notation of Dutch retroactive projection of national classification as part of interface with modern online research in general and in connexion with Espacenet)
(reference German classification of French patent)
Line 25: Line 25:
 
** [[NBER patent classifications]] - a grouping of the USPC system into larger simpler clusters, used in economics research especially
 
** [[NBER patent classifications]] - a grouping of the USPC system into larger simpler clusters, used in economics research especially
 
** US patent classifications of [[US1830 patent classification|1830]], [[US1836 patent classification|1836]], [[US1867 patent classification|1867]], [[US1872 patent classification|1872]], [[US1878 patent classification|1878]], [[US1899 patent classification|1899]], [[US1900 patent classification|1900]]
 
** US patent classifications of [[US1830 patent classification|1830]], [[US1836 patent classification|1836]], [[US1867 patent classification|1867]], [[US1872 patent classification|1872]], [[US1878 patent classification|1878]], [[US1899 patent classification|1899]], [[US1900 patent classification|1900]]
 +
 +
=== Notes ===
 +
In the scan of [[Patent FR-1903-325343]] we have an instance of classifications by the German office written onto their copy of a French patent (albeit a member of an international family of which a German version probably also existed and required classification).
  
 
{{Techtype
 
{{Techtype

Revision as of 04:35, 8 February 2021

There have been many patent classification systems, varying over time, and varying between nations in the manner and the timing of their evolutions. To the present-day researcher, working at least largely online, and interested in finding antique patent material, international/global systems are of note in their retroactive projection of later international classifications onto antique, and national, patent material. Contemporary national patent websites, when they exist, vary in their overall quality and in terms of their active interfacing with the below-mentioned internation/global sytems and with the international websites through which we may gain at least a partial overview. All of this affects our manner of gathering data and in some instances it affects the manner in which we ultimately determine the antique patent classifications which were nationally applied.

International/global systems

  • the CPC category system is the most modern and global, started 2010
  • the IPC is the predecessor to the CPC, started 1971, per Wang (2018)]]
    • IPC1-7 - an IPC version or variant
    • sometimes there are specific references to the 2006 or other dates of one of these

National systems

Notes

In the scan of Patent FR-1903-325343 we have an instance of classifications by the German office written onto their copy of a French patent (albeit a member of an international family of which a German version probably also existed and required classification).

Enclosing categories Techtype
Subcategories CPC, IPC, IPC1-7, Australian patent classifications, Austrian patent classifications, Belgian patent classifications, British patent classifications, Canadian patent classifications, Dutch patent classifications, French patent classifications, German patent classifications, Hungarian patent classifications, Swedish patent classifications, Swiss patent classifications, US patent classification systems, USPC
Keywords
Start year
End year