Emmanuel Chadeau

From Inventing aviation
Revision as of 08:58, 13 March 2019 by AvionHerbert (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Doctoral Dissertation: État, Enterprise & Développement Économique : L’Industrie Aéronautique en France (1900-1940)
L'ECHEC DE LA RECHERCHE MILITAIRE (1880-1905) p.164
Chadeau unpublished dissertation p.175
Chadeau unpublished dissertation p.176
AERONAUTIQUE ET SOCIETE CIVILE : LES BASES DE L'INVENTION FECONDE p.176
Chadeau unpublished dissertation p.176
Chadeau unpublished dissertation p.176
Chadeau unpublished dissertation p.179
Chadeau unpublished dissertation p.179
Chadeau unpublished dissertation p.179
p. 180 Fig 57 LES CIRCUITS DE LA RECHERCHE AERONAUTIQUE PRIVEE EN FRANCE EN 1905
Chadeau unpublished dissertation p.180
Chadeau unpublished dissertation p.183



Works:




Names Emmanuel Chadeau
Birth date
Death date circa 2000
Countries FR
Locations Lille
Occupations author
Tech areas History, business history, aeronautical history
Affiliations University of Lille, Lille III
Wikidata id



Emmanuel Chadeau was primarily an economic historian, focusing on the economic and industrial development of France, with a fairly strong emphasis on aviation, in the context of these other emphases. Aside from his own prolific writing, he presented the writings of others, studies were conducted, under his direction, and the output of several colloquia were published, these colloquia occurring under his direction. In his capacity as faculty at Lille III, he also oversaw a great number of Master's theses. We are gradually working this complex out, by degrees, and as variably pertinent to his analyses of aeronautical development.

(The titles we have here were drawn from a document FONDS EMMANUEL CHADEAU, given to us by a librarian at Lille III. Many names recur in the dynamic of these publication, with the role of Chadeau playing variably relative to the recurrent names of other scholars, such as Pierre Birnbaum. These "FONDS" also contain a great output of other scholarly work. To the work less directly touched by Chadeau himself we are more strictly applying the criteria of aero-relevance, and relevance to the period we are studying. We are being more broadly inclusive of Chadeau's own work, and that most directly directed by him. He did write beyond the aeronautical field, and he did write on aeronautical subjects as they developed after the years we are studying. We are giving him fairly complete coverage, as an individual, giving context to his more directly pertinent analyses.)

We are looking into Chadeau's several other published works. His collection of works, by others, many having to do with France trajectory of industrial capital, some with a specific emphasis on aviation, is also of note. In his capacity as a faculty member at Université Lille-III, he did this collecting, pertinent to us, and he also oversaw the Masters' these of another generation.

We are also looking into the unpublished version of the fairly immense Doctoral dissertation, “État, Enterprise & Développement Économique : L’Industrie Aéronautique en France (1900-1940)". We may look into the published version as well. This gets into the ateliers associated with Appareils d'Aviation Les Frères Voisin, and with the Société Antoinette, as well as into thoughts on Clément Ader, relative to the French military. The role of the French state, as furthering or hindering the progressive impulses of the aeronautic pioneers, is also pertinent.

We are still fleshing this out, and the published dissertation, available online, will be of interest cross-referenced with the unpublished.

On p.164 of the unpublished version, he alleges a check on military aero-research from 1880-1905, and on p.176 he asserts the presence of fertile bases of aeronautic development, up through 1906.

His Figure 57, on page 180, offers a diagram, and an explanation, articulating the dynamics of aeronautical development, inclusive of subcategories, relative to funding, the state, the military, and relative to other industries. All of this is penciled out. We are uncertain as to permanent inclusion, exclusion, or variation of the material in the published version. We are documenting his thought processes, over time, relative to our other manners of data tracking.