National temperament and national image
Contents
The Idea of National Temperament :
This is an idea not to be rushed, or over-done, but which we’d like to keep onhand. Even at its most nationalistically competitive, and sometimes bellicose, the long process of aero-innovation seems to have been tinged with internationalism, with a cross-fertilization of ideas going beyond boundaries.
We are looking very tentatively at phenomena of “national temperament” as an actual truth, and we are also looking at national “image” as promotional ideas we see cultivated from time to time.
The background and context of the individual inventor :
We may rightfully or wrongfully read nation-based personality traits into any given inventor. In general, we don’t do this. There are odd cases in which a national publication may promote the innovations of one of its countrymen, to the detriment of some other inventor, and terms used may lean into ideas bordering on stereotypes. Patent FR-1895-277723, for instance, as covered by « Chronologie Aéronautique » pages of Aéro-Manuel, has Ferdinand Von Zeppelin being granted his patent, in France, and praises the German’s energy and perserverance, while on the other hand going so far as to deny his status as “l’inventeur”, as such, alleging that Patent FR-1873-100696 of Joseph Spiess contains the true kernel of innovation.[1] We may see this as humourous, and nationalistically biased indeed. In terms of the data we are tracking, any nuance in technical application may indeed constitute “invention”, aside from these ideas of variations in “national temperament”, and the French coverage, in this case, is charged with both French and German ideas of particular virtues, characteristics entering into national stereotype.
The administrative culture and other institutional factors as they vary internationally :
This comes up in the context of patents classifications, the institutions doing the classification, mere compliance as opposed to enthusiastic compliance, regading international priority dates and so forth. We don’t know the extent which inventors, in their own conceptually innovative processes, were themselves swayed by the patent classification and other niceties involved. Again, it may be in the context of patent classification systems that we have an interface between these semi-abstract variably national phenomena and our ongoing intake of quantifiable data.
Work done by others, pertinent to Canada and so forth :
We are familiar with work being presently conducted and finalized by others, studies of cases in which national temperament or “image” or even “national brand” are handled pro-actively. We’ll integrate references to said works as they become finalized, and made more propoerly public.
