Talk:Belgium
Trying to add the below to the page but getting a server error. When editing works again I also mean to move "aeronautics history" into its own section. LTA (talk) 04:01, 2 February 2021 (PST) A new patent law was passed on 24 May 1854, and this remained the main reference through 1915.[1]
- ↑ Thompson, Handbook of Patent Law in All Countries (1915), p. 90.
Attempting to edit again on another day, I still get the below error. Anyone know why? LTA (talk) 13:32, 3 February 2021 (PST)
Internal Server Error
The server encountered an internal error or misconfiguration and was unable to complete your request.
Please contact the server administrator at webmaster@econterms.net to inform them of the time this error occurred, and the actions you performed just before this error.
More information about this error may be available in the server error log.
Update
- It comes from security software on Dreamhost. The software's called ModSecurity, and is described on Wikipedia. Something about how it's configured is making this site or edits to it look risky. They've reconfigured or turned off what was wrong . . . it seems. But keep watching. -- Meyer (talk) 15:59, 29 April 2021 (PDT)
Regarding separation of patent data from other data
I've started a nationally-designated "Fuller patent report" page tradition, starting with Fuller patent report Hungary and Fuller patent report Italy and Fuller patent report Belgium. The displays are good, spotlighting a lot of positive connections as well as indications of work needed, all-caps inventor name and more and more and more, all glitches in the process of data intergration. Calling these nations "second tier", the display volume is substantial. Doing the same with "first tier" nations would also be worth it, though France, for instance, looks well enough with the same report type right on the country page itself. Cuba and Norway, for instance, can clearly handle the fuller data dsiplay on the country page(s). I just applied the pertinent patent report templates to Great Britain, but we could opt for the separate report page later, or not.
